Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Tradeoff between no-call reduction in genotyping error rate and loss of sample size for genetic case/control association studies.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing - 1 Jan 2004

Kang S J, Gordon D, Brown A M, Ott J, Finch S J

Abstract excerpt

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) may be genotyped for use in case-control designs to test for association between a SNP marker and a disease using a 2 x 3 chi-squared test of independence. Genotyping is often based on underlying continuous measurements, which are classified into genotypes. A "no-call" procedure is sometimes used in which borderline observations are not classified. This procedure has the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Case-Control Studies
Share to Chi-Square Distribution

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Computational Biology

Share to Genotype

Share to Models, Statistical

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to Sample Size

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 14992497
DOI: 10.1142/9789812704856_0012

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Tradeoff between no-call reduction in genotyping error rate and loss of sample size for genetic case/control association studies.PMID 14992497Read ↗

What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies?Semantic proximity Read ↗

How to link call rate and p-values for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium as measures of genome-wide SNP data quality.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Quantification of the power of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium testing to detect genotyping error.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Quantifying the percent increase in minimum sample size for SNP genotyping errors in genetic model-based association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessing the impact of non-differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.Semantic proximity Read ↗

M(3)-S: a genotype calling method incorporating information from samples with known genotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Recovering unused information in genome-wide association studies: the benefit of analyzing SNPs out of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Differential dropout among SNP genotypes and impacts on association tests.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Power and sample size calculations in the presence of phenotype errors for case/control genetic association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotyping and inflated type I error rate in genome-wide association case/control studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The cost effectiveness of duplicate genotyping for testing genetic association.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Missing call bias in high-throughput genotyping.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.