Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies?

Genetic epidemiology - 1 Feb 2004

Kang Sun Jung, Gordon Derek, Finch Stephen J

Abstract excerpt

Which genotype misclassification errors are most costly, in terms of increased sample size necessary (SSN) to maintain constant asymptotic power and significance level, when performing case/control studies of genetic association? We answer this question for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs),...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Case-Control Studies
Share to Chromosome Mapping
Share to Linkage Disequilibrium

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Mathematical Computing

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Share to Sample Size

Share to Selection Bias

Share to Software

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 14748013
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.10301

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-14748013-2026-09-02.1. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-02.1.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies?PMID 14748013Read ↗

Quantifying the percent increase in minimum sample size for SNP genotyping errors in genetic model-based association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The effects of SNP genotyping errors on the power of the Cochran-Armitage linear trend test for case/control association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessing the impact of non-differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The cost effectiveness of duplicate genotyping for testing genetic association.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of genotyping errors on the type I error rate and the power of haplotype-based association methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessing the impact of differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Power and sample size calculations for case-control genetic association tests when errors are present: application to single nucleotide polymorphisms.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A note on exact tests of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment and management of single nucleotide polymorphism genotype errors in genetic association analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Quantification of the power of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium testing to detect genotyping error.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Calculation and use of the Hardy-Weinberg model in association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Allowing for genotyping error in analysis of unmatched case-control studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.