Article

Trusting the Source: How Perceived Feedback Provider Influences Students’ Evaluation of AI-Generated Feedback in Reflective Writing

2025-10-23

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Students’ engagement with feedback depends not only on its content but also on who they believe produced it. In educational settings, especially in reflective writing, perceptions of empathy, care, and credibility play a central role in how feedback is received. As generative AI tools become increasingly capable of producing detailed and personalized feedback, questions arise about stud...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Uncategorized literature

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 6de226de-fb2e-5664-b350-7de9581beff0
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7922211/v1

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Trusting the Source: How Perceived Feedback Provider Influences Students’ Evaluation of AI-Generated Feedback in Reflective WritingDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7922211/v1Read

Teacher, Peer, or AI? Comparing Effects of Feedback Sources in Higher EducationSemantic proximity Read

Natural Language Processing and Generative AI in the Automated Scoring and Feedback of Reflective Writing in Medical Education: A Validity and Fairness AnalysisSemantic proximity Read

Human-Labeled Feedback Signals More Investment: Explaining Differential Perceptions of AI vs Human Instructor FeedbackSemantic proximity Read

Students’ psychological biases towards teacher and AI-generated feedback: An experiment studySemantic proximity Read

Human-Centered GenAI Feedback Design in Higher Education: A Multisite Experiment on Direct, Reflective, and Hybrid Approaches to Scientific ArgumentationSemantic proximity Read

Augmenting thesis supervision with generative AI feedback: Evaluating the quality and perceived usefulness GenAI feedbackSemantic proximity Read

A Systematic Comparative Review of Generative AI vs. Teacher Feedback in EFL Writing: Learner Perceptions, Preferences, and Psychological FactorsSemantic proximity Read

Teachers’ Views on the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Assessing and Providing Feedback on EFL Academic Writing in AzerbaijanSemantic proximity Read

Large Language Model–Generated Tutoring Responses Receive Higher Ratings but Are Penalized by Source-Based Evaluation BiasSemantic proximity Read

Passing the Turing Test: Fine-tuned AI feedback is less detectable than human or prompt-engineered feedbackSemantic proximity Read

Can AI replace Teachers? Comparing AI and Human Teachers’ ratings and feedback on students’ essaysSemantic proximity Read