Back to search

Article

Augmenting thesis supervision with generative AI feedback: Evaluating the quality and perceived usefulness GenAI feedback

2026-02-10

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Delivering timely, high-quality feedback on long-form academic student writing is hard to scale. Therefore, we developed a generative AI feedback tool for undergraduate medical theses. Feedback was based on 36 criteria, and feedback quality was evaluated on six aspects. Feedback consistency was assessed across five repeated iterations, robustness across thesis types and grades, and comp...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
210a63d4-221c-5e17-ad1d-4a5053f8edcd
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-8352038/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Augmenting thesis supervision with generative AI feedback: Evaluating the quality and perceived usefulness GenAI feedbackDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8352038/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.