Back to search

Article

Passing the Turing Test: Fine-tuned AI feedback is less detectable than human or prompt-engineered feedback

2025-09-03

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into educational technologies, questions arise about the authenticity and pedagogical value of AI-generated feedback. This study investigates whether human participants can distinguish between feedback written by a human instructor and that generated by an AI model, and how the method of generation (prompt engineering vs. fi...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
e5788196-1fab-59b4-b61f-20da2569e496
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-7486768/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Passing the Turing Test: Fine-tuned AI feedback is less detectable than human or prompt-engineered feedbackDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7486768/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.