Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparing apples and oranges: equating the power of case-control and quantitative trait association studies.

Genetic epidemiology - 1 Apr 2010

Yang Jian, Wray Naomi R, Visscher Peter M

Abstract excerpt

Genome-wide association studies have achieved unprecedented success in the identification of novel genes and pathways implicated in complex traits. Typically, studies for disease use a case-control (CC) design and studies for quantitative traits (QT) are population based. The question that we add...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Algorithms
Share to Calibration
Share to Models, Statistical

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Prevalence

Share to Quantitative Trait Loci

Share to Research Design

Share to Sample Size

Share to Schizophrenia

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 19918758
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20456

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-19918758-2026-09-02.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-02.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 11 closest

Comparing apples and oranges: equating the power of case-control and quantitative trait association studies.PMID 19918758Read ↗

Estimating Heritability and Genetic Correlation in Case Control Studies Directly and with Summary StatisticsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Method to estimate the approximate samples size that yield a certain number of significant GWAS signals in polygenic traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The role of mitochondrial DNA copy number in neuropsychiatric disorders: A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization studySemantic proximity Read ↗

TS: a powerful truncated test to detect novel disease associated genes using publicly available gWAS summary data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Bayesian Approach to the Overlap Analysis of Epidemiologically Linked Traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Power comparison of Cochran-Armitage trend test against allelic and genotypic tests in large-scale case-control genetic association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Power and sample size calculations in the presence of phenotype errors for case/control genetic association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Association between blood mitochondrial DNA copy number and mental disorders: A bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

CalPen (Calculator of Penetrance), a web-based tool to estimate penetrance in complex genetic disorders.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A fast and powerful eQTL weighted method to detect genes associated with complex trait using GWAS summary data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The statistical power of genome-wide association studies for threshold traits with different frequencies of causal variants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.