Back to search

Article

An empirical investigation into the impact of winner’s curse on estimates from Mendelian randomization

2022-08-06

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Introduction</h4> Genetic associations for variants identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) tend to be overestimated in the original discovery dataset; as if the association was underestimated, the variant may not have been detected. This bias, known as winner’s curse, can affect Mendelian randomization estimates, but its severity and potential impact is unclear. <h4>Methods</h4> We performed...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
595472e0-8ab9-547e-b972-521aa42018ca
DOI
10.1101/2022.08.05.22278470
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
An empirical investigation into the impact of winner’s curse on estimates from Mendelian randomizationDOI 10.1101/2022.08.05.22278470
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.