Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Power evaluation of asymptotic tests for comparing two binomial proportions to detect direct and indirect association in large-scale studies.

Statistical methods in medical research - 1 Dec 2017

Emily Mathieu, Friguet Chloé

Abstract excerpt

Asymptotic tests are commonly used for comparing two binomial proportions when the sample size is sufficiently large. However, there is no consensus on the most powerful test. In this paper, we clarify this issue by comparing the power functions of three popular asymptotic tests: the Pearson's χ2 test, the likelihood-ratio test and the odds-ratio based test. Considering Taylor decompositions under local...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biostatistics
Share to Computer Simulation
Share to Likelihood Functions

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Logistic Models

Share to Models, Statistical

Share to Molecular Epidemiology

Share to Odds Ratio

Share to Sample Size

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 26468267
DOI: 10.1177/0962280215608528

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Power evaluation of asymptotic tests for comparing two binomial proportions to detect direct and indirect association in large-scale studies.PMID 26468267Read ↗

Computing power in case-control association studies through the use of quadratic approximations: application to meta-statistics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Bayes factor based on the trend test incorporating Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium: more power to detect genetic association.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Quantifying posterior effect size distribution of susceptibility loci by common summary statistics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Power calculations for a general class of family-based association tests: dichotomous traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Power comparison of Cochran-Armitage trend test against allelic and genotypic tests in large-scale case-control genetic association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Asymptotic tests of association with multiple SNPs in linkage disequilibrium.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Bayes factors for genome-wide association studies: comparison with P-values.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Quantifying posterior effect size distribution of susceptibility loci by common summary statisticsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Calculation of exact p-values when SNPs are tested using multiple genetic models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Nonparametric evaluation of quantitative traits in population-based association studies when the genetic model is unknown.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Transformation to estimate the causal effect in Mendelian randomization study with binary risk factor and outcome.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.