Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.

Human heredity - 1 Jan 2007

Moskvina V, O'Donovan M C

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVES: Genetic association studies are usually based upon restricted sets of 'tag' markers selected to represent the total sequence variation. Tag selection is often determined by some threshold for the r(2) coefficients of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between tag and untyped markers, it being widely assumed that power to detect an effect at the untyped sites is retained by typing the tag marker in a sample...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Gene Frequency
Share to Genetic Markers
Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Techniques

Share to Haplotypes

Share to Linkage Disequilibrium

Share to Models, Statistical

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 17483598
DOI: 10.1159/000101424

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.PMID 17483598Read ↗

Two-phase designs to follow-up genome-wide association signals with DNA resequencing studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of single-locus tests to detect gene/disease associations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Linkage effects and analysis of finite sample errors in the HapMap.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Power evaluation of asymptotic tests for comparing two binomial proportions to detect direct and indirect association in large-scale studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Power calculations for genetic association studies using estimated probability distributions.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Power of genome-wide association studies in the presence of interacting loci.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Power and sample size for testing associations of haplotypes with complex traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Power analysis for genome-wide association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Efficiency and power in genetic association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Does strong linkage disequilibrium guarantee redundant association results?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sample size requirements for indirect association studies of gene-environment interactions (G x E).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Efficient association study design via power-optimized tag SNP selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.