Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples

14 May 2013

Abstract excerpt

Differences in the composition of the gut microbiota have been associated with a range of diseases using culture-independent methods. Reliable extraction of nucleic acid is a key step in identifying the composition of the faecal microbiota. Five widely used commercial deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction kits (QIAsymphony® Virus/Bacteria Midi Kit (kit QS), ZR Fecal DNA MiniPrep™ (kit Z), QIAamp® DNA Stool Mini...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Share to Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 23684993
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.05.008

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samplesPMID 23684993Read ↗

Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of five commercial methods for the extraction and purification of DNA from human faecal samples for downstream molecular detection of the enteric protozoan parasites Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Entamoeba sppSemantic proximity Read ↗

The Impact of Different DNA Extraction Kits and Laboratories upon the Assessment of Human Gut Microbiota Composition by 16S rRNA Gene SequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Microbial diversity in fecal samples depends on DNA extraction method: easyMag DNA extraction compared to QIAamp DNA stool mini kit extractionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimensSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of five assays for DNA extraction from bacterial cells in human faecal samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

A unique and reliable fecal DNA extraction method for 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiomeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Gut Microbiota Analysis Results Are Highly Dependent on the 16S rRNA Gene Target Region, Whereas the Impact of DNA Extraction Is MinorSemantic proximity Read ↗

Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platformSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of PCR versus PCR-Free DNA Library Preparation for Characterising the Human Faecal ViromeSemantic proximity Read ↗

The effect of DNA extraction methodology on gut microbiota research applicationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.