Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens

22 May 2010

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: The influence of diet on intestinal microflora has been investigated mainly using conventional microbiological approaches. Although these studies have advanced knowledge on human intestinal microflora, it is imperative that new methods are applied to facilitate scientific progress. Culture-independent molecular fingerprinting method of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Denaturing Gradient Gel...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Share to Fecal contamination and water quality
Share to Gut microbiota and health

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 20492702
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-9-23

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimensPMID 20492702Read ↗

Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

The Impact of Different DNA Extraction Kits and Laboratories upon the Assessment of Human Gut Microbiota Composition by 16S rRNA Gene SequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Microbial diversity in fecal samples depends on DNA extraction method: easyMag DNA extraction compared to QIAamp DNA stool mini kit extractionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platformSemantic proximity Read ↗

Choice of DNA extraction method affects stool microbiome recovery and subsequent phenotypic association analysesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating variation in human gut microbiota profiles due to DNA extraction method and inter-subject differencesSemantic proximity Read ↗

High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Choice of DNA extraction method affects stool microbiome recovery and subsequent phenotypic association analysesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Bifidobacterial diversity in human feces detected by genus-specific PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.