Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The Impact of Different DNA Extraction Kits and Laboratories upon the Assessment of Human Gut Microbiota Composition by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

24 Feb 2014

Abstract excerpt

INTRODUCTION: Determining bacterial community structure in fecal samples through DNA sequencing is an important facet of intestinal health research. The impact of different commercially available DNA extraction kits upon bacterial community structures has received relatively little attention. The aim of this study was to analyze bacterial communities in volunteer and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patient fecal...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Share to Fecal contamination and water quality
Share to Gut microbiota and health

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 24586470
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088982

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The Impact of Different DNA Extraction Kits and Laboratories upon the Assessment of Human Gut Microbiota Composition by 16S rRNA Gene SequencingPMID 24586470Read ↗

Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platformSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating variation in human gut microbiota profiles due to DNA extraction method and inter-subject differencesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimensSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiomeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Gut Microbiota Analysis Results Are Highly Dependent on the 16S rRNA Gene Target Region, Whereas the Impact of DNA Extraction Is MinorSemantic proximity Read ↗

Methodology challenges in studying human gut microbiota – effects of collection, storage, DNA extraction and next generation sequencing technologiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Choice of DNA extraction method affects stool microbiome recovery and subsequent phenotypic association analysesSemantic proximity Read ↗

The Impact of DNA Extraction Methods on Stool Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota Community RecoverySemantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.