Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Microbial diversity in fecal samples depends on DNA extraction method: easyMag DNA extraction compared to QIAamp DNA stool mini kit extraction

1 Jan 2014

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: There are challenges, when extracting bacterial DNA from specimens for molecular diagnostics, since fecal samples also contain DNA from human cells and many different substances derived from food, cell residues and medication that can inhibit downstream PCR. The purpose of the study was to evaluate two different DNA extraction methods in order to choose the most efficient method for studying...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Share to Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Share to Gut microbiota and health

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 24447346
DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-50

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Microbial diversity in fecal samples depends on DNA extraction method: easyMag DNA extraction compared to QIAamp DNA stool mini kit extractionPMID 24447346Read ↗

Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimensSemantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platformSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of five assays for DNA extraction from bacterial cells in human faecal samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

The Impact of Different DNA Extraction Kits and Laboratories upon the Assessment of Human Gut Microbiota Composition by 16S rRNA Gene SequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

A Comparison of Three Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction Systems for Human Stool SamplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Choice of DNA extraction method affects stool microbiome recovery and subsequent phenotypic association analysesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Gut Microbiota Analysis Results Are Highly Dependent on the 16S rRNA Gene Target Region, Whereas the Impact of DNA Extraction Is MinorSemantic proximity Read ↗

A unique and reliable fecal DNA extraction method for 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiomeSemantic proximity Read ↗

The effect of DNA extraction methodology on gut microbiota research applicationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.