Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of five assays for DNA extraction from bacterial cells in human faecal samples

8 Feb 2020

Abstract excerpt

AIM: To determine the most effective DNA extraction method for bacteria in faecal samples. MATERIALS AND RESULTS: This study assessed five commercial methods, that is, NucliSens easyMag, QIAamp DNA Stool Mini kit, PureLink Microbiome DNA purification kit, QIAamp PowerFecal DNA kit and RNeasy PowerMicrobiome kit, of which the latter has been optimized for DNA extraction. The DNA quantity and quality were...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Share to Fecal contamination and water quality
Share to Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 32034968
DOI: 10.1111/jam.14608

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of five assays for DNA extraction from bacterial cells in human faecal samplesPMID 32034968Read ↗

A Comparison of Three Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction Systems for Human Stool SamplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of DNA extraction methods for human gut mycobiome analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Microbial diversity in fecal samples depends on DNA extraction method: easyMag DNA extraction compared to QIAamp DNA stool mini kit extractionSemantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platformSemantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of five methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from human faecal samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiomeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Choice of DNA extraction method affects stool microbiome recovery and subsequent phenotypic association analysesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Optimizing storage, high-molecular weight DNA extraction and genome reconstructions from human faecal samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.