Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of tests and procedures to build clinically relevant genotypic scores: application to the Jaguar study.

Antiviral therapy - 1 Jan 2005

Flandre Philippe, Marcelin Anne-Geneviève, Pavie Juliette, Shmidely Nathalie, Wirden Marc, Lada Olivier, Bernard Marie-Charlotte, Molina Jean-Michel, Calvez Vincent

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVE: To compare non-parametric tests and procedures of selection in building clinically validated genotypic scores. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: In the Jaguar study, 111 patients on a stable antiretroviral regimen experiencing virological failure were randomized in the didanosine (ddI) arm to receive ddI for 4 weeks in addition to their current combination therapy. METHODS: The virological response was HIV-1 RNA...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Anti-HIV Agents
Share to Data Interpretation, Statistical

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Didanosine

Share to Double-Blind Method

Share to Drug Resistance, Viral

Share to Drug Therapy, Combination

Share to HIV Infections

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 16038473

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of tests and procedures to build clinically relevant genotypic scores: application to the Jaguar study.PMID 16038473Read ↗

An additive/subtractive genotypic score as a determinant of the virological response to didanosine in HIV-1 infected patients.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improved interpretation of genotypic changes in the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase coding region that determine the virological response to didanosine.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Clinically relevant genotype interpretation of resistance to didanosine.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Scoring methods for building genotypic scores: an application to didanosine resistance in a large derivation set.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase polymorphism at codons 211 and 228 on virological response to didanosine.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Clinically validated genotype analysis: guiding principles and statistical concerns.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development of a didanosine genotypic resistance interpretation system based on large derivation and validation datasets.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Initiatives for developing and comparing genotype interpretation systems: external validation of existing systems for didanosine against virological response.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of HIV-1 genotypic resistance test interpretation systems in predicting virological outcomes over time.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prediction of HIV-1 drug susceptibility phenotype from the viral genotype using linear regression modeling.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Rules-based HIV-1 genotypic resistance interpretation systems predict 8 week and 24 week virological antiretroviral treatment outcome and benefit from drug potency weighting.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Relative contributions of baseline patient characteristics and the choice of statistical methods to the variability of genotypic resistance scores: the example of didanosine.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.