Back to search

Article

Discordant results among MHC binding affinity prediction tools

2022-12-07

Abstract excerpt

<h4>ABSTRACT</h4> A large number of machine learning-based Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) binding affinity (BA) prediction tools have been developed and are widely used for both investigational and therapeutic applications, so it is important to explore differences in tool outputs. We examined predictions of four popular tools (netMHCpan, HLAthena, MHCflurry, and MHCnuggets) across a range of possible pep...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
b77c1aa1-57b5-599b-a6d6-e4a1dcda0e61
DOI
10.1101/2022.12.04.518984
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Discordant results among MHC binding affinity prediction toolsDOI 10.1101/2022.12.04.518984
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.