Back to search

Article

A Comparison Of Robust Mendelian Randomization Methods Using Summary Data

2019-03-15

Abstract excerpt

The number of Mendelian randomization analyses including large numbers of genetic variants is rapidly increasing. This is due to the proliferation of genome-wide association studies, and the desire to obtain more precise estimates of causal effects. Since it is unlikely that all genetic variants will be valid instrumental variables, several robust methods have been proposed. We compare nine robust methods for Mend...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
655b1a5e-1ce0-51ae-82bb-2e1a3198c691
DOI
10.1101/577940
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
A Comparison Of Robust Mendelian Randomization Methods Using Summary DataDOI 10.1101/577940
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.