Back to search

Article

Environmental impact judgments of meat, vegetarian, and insect burgers: Unifying the negative footprint illusion and quantity insensitivity

2019-12-01

Abstract excerpt

Climate-related risks for natural and human systems increase with global warming. Meat production contributes considerably to global greenhouse gas emissions. Changes in consumption patterns can help reduce this impact – e.g., by replacing meat with plant or insect-based alternatives. For this to happen, it is important to understand how such products are perceived in terms of their environmental impact. Two cogni...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
46d98616-1577-5d9e-8659-6af31c844224
DOI
10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103731
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Environmental impact judgments of meat, vegetarian, and insect burgers: Unifying the negative footprint illusion and quantity insensitivityDOI 10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103731
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.