Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A comparison of different algorithms for phasing haplotypes using Holstein cattle genotypes and pedigree data.

Journal of dairy science - 1 Apr 2017

Miar Younes, Sargolzaei Mehdi, Schenkel Flavio S

Abstract excerpt

Phasing genotypes to haplotypes is becoming increasingly important due to its applications in the study of diseases, population and evolutionary genetics, imputation, and so on. Several studies have focused on the development of computational methods that infer haplotype phase from population genotype data. The aim of this study was to compare phasing algorithms implemented in Beagle, Findhap, FImpute, Impute2,...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Algorithms
Share to Cattle
Share to Genotype

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Haplotypes

Share to Pedigree

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 28161175
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11590

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A comparison of different algorithms for phasing haplotypes using Holstein cattle genotypes and pedigree data.PMID 28161175Read ↗

Benchmarking phasing software with a whole-genome sequenced cattle pedigree.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A combined long-range phasing and long haplotype imputation method to impute phase for SNP genotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Extending long-range phasing and haplotype library imputation algorithms to large and heterogeneous datasets.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Fast two-stage phasing of large-scale sequence data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comparative analysis of current phasing and imputation software.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of different methods for imputing genome-wide marker genotypes in Swedish and Finnish Red Cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: imputing genotypes using PedImpute fast algorithm combining pedigree and population information.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of different imputation methods from low- to high-density panels using Chinese Holstein cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Imputation of high-density genotypes in the Fleckvieh cattle population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of the performance of different hidden Markov models for imputation in animal breedingSemantic proximity Read ↗

A fast data-driven method for genotype imputation, phasing and local ancestry inference: MendelImpute.jl.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Novel methods for genotype imputation to whole-genome sequence and a simple linear model to predict imputation accuracy.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.