Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparing performance of modern genotype imputation methods in different ethnicities.

Scientific reports - 4 Oct 2016

Roshyara Nab Raj, Horn Katrin, Kirsten Holger, Ahnert Peter, Scholz Markus

Abstract excerpt

A variety of modern software packages are available for genotype imputation relying on advanced concepts such as pre-phasing of the target dataset or utilization of admixed reference panels. In this study, we performed a comprehensive evaluation of the accuracy of modern imputation methods on the basis of the publicly available POPRES samples. Good quality genotypes were masked and re-imputed by different...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22
Share to Databases, Nucleic Acid

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Ethnicity

Share to Genotype

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to Software

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 27698363
DOI: 10.1038/srep34386
PMCID: PMC5048136

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparing performance of modern genotype imputation methods in different ethnicities.PMID 27698363Read ↗

Impact of genetic similarity on imputation accuracy.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of imputation performance of multiple reference panels in a Pakistani population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The effect of reference panels and software tools on genotype imputation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Population-specific genotype imputations using minimac or IMPUTE2.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Imputation accuracy across global human populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A diverse ancestrally-matched reference panel increases genotype imputation accuracy in a underrepresented population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A multi-ethnic reference panel to impute HLA classical and non-classical class I alleles in admixed samples: Testing imputation accuracy in an admixed sample from Brazil.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Imputation of missing genotypes: an empirical evaluation of IMPUTE.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of genotype imputation performance using 1000 Genomes in African American studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Analyses and comparison of accuracy of different genotype imputation methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

On combining reference data to improve imputation accuracy.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Imputation Disparities Driven by Recent Selection and Their Impact on Disease Risk Estimation in East and Southeast Asian PopulationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.