Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Genome-based versus gene-based theory of cancer: possible implications for clinical practice.

Journal of biosciences - 1 Sept 2011

Todorovic-Rakovic Natasa

Abstract excerpt

The current state in oncology research indicates that the attempts to explain such complex process as cancerogenesis by a single or several genetic mutations were not successful enough. On the other hand, chromosomal/genomic instability--almost universal features of malignant tumours which influence a global pattern of gene expression and, subsequently, many oncogenic pathways--were often disregarded and...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Aneuploidy
Share to Comparative Genomic Hybridization
Share to DNA Copy Number Variations

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Epigenomics

Share to Gene Dosage

Share to Genome, Human

Share to Genomic Instability

Share to Systems Biology

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 21857118
DOI: 10.1007/s12038-011-9099-9

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Genome-based versus gene-based theory of cancer: possible implications for clinical practice.PMID 21857118Read ↗

Genetic and epigenetic heterogeneity in cancer: a genome-centric perspective.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic and non-genetic instability in tumor progression: link between the fitness landscape and the epigenetic landscape of cancer cells.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cancer: more of polygenic disease and less of multiple mutations? A quantitative viewpoint.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cancer models, genomic instability and somatic cellular Darwinian evolutionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Copy number alterations and copy number variation in cancer: close encounters of the bad kind.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The chromosomal basis of cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A critical appraisal of the relative contribution of tissue architecture, genetics, epigenetics and cell metabolism to carcinogenesis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The sources of variation in the human genome and genome instability in human cancers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

[Stochastic phenomena and the tumoral process].Semantic proximity Read ↗

[Diffusion of genetic testing in oncology: what criteria for regulation?].Semantic proximity Read ↗

BENIGN AND PATHOLOGICAL GAIN OR LOSS OF GENETIC MATERIAL — ABOUT MICROSCOPIC AND SUBMICROSCOPIC COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS (CNVs) IN HUMAN GENETICS.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Karyotype/phenotype controversy: genetic and molecular implications of alternative hypotheses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.