Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

On the fitting of binding data when receptor dimerization is suspected.

British journal of pharmacology - 1 Sept 2008

Giraldo J

Abstract excerpt

Mechanistic and empirical modelling are compared in context of dimeric receptors. In particular, the supposed advantages of the two-state dimer model for fitting of binding data with respect to classical approaches such as the two-independent sites model are investigated. The two models are revis...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Binding Sites
Share to Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Share to Genotype

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Kinetics

Share to Ligands

Share to Models, Biological

Share to Protein Multimerization

Share to Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 18536745
DOI: 10.1038/bjp.2008.234
PMCID: PMC2527846

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-18536745-2026-09-02.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-02.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

On the fitting of binding data when receptor dimerization is suspected.PMID 18536745Read ↗

An evolutionary view of drug-receptor interaction: the bioamine receptor family.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The diversity of subunit composition in nAChRs: evolutionary origins, physiologic and pharmacologic consequences.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Biochemical and pharmacological control of the multiplicity of coupling at G-protein-coupled receptors.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Computational modeling of intramolecular and intermolecular communication in GPCRs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Inverse agonism: from curiosity to accepted dogma, but is it clinically relevant?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Metastable GPCR dimers trigger the basal signal by recruiting G-proteinsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Incorporating Receptor Theory in Mechanism-Based Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) ModelingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Beta2-adrenergic receptor homodimers: Role of transmembrane domain 1 and helix 8 in dimerization and cell surface expression.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Agonist induction, conformational selection, and mutant receptors.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Subtype differences in pre-coupling of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Agonist efficiency links binding and gating in a nicotinic receptor.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Heterogeneity in EGF-binding affinities arises from negative cooperativity in an aggregating system.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.