Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

What Is the Best Way to Assess Microsatellite Instability Status in Colorectal Cancer?

18 Nov 2004

Abstract excerpt

The assessment of the microsatellite instability (MSI) status in colorectal cancers is presently warranted for three reasons: 1) as a screening tool for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, 2) as a prognostic marker, and 3) as a potential predictive factor of chemotherapy response. The aim of this study was to evaluate, on a large scale with tissue samples coming from a number of different sources, the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Share to Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Share to Genetic factors in colorectal cancer

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 15577673
DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200412000-00002

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

What Is the Best Way to Assess Microsatellite Instability Status in Colorectal Cancer?PMID 15577673Read ↗

Prognostic values of detecting MSI phenotypes in colorectal carcinoma by immunohistochemical method compared to molecular investigation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Day-To-Day Practice of MMR and MSI Assessment in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: What We Know and What We Still Need to ExploreSemantic proximity Read ↗

Immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite instability testing in phenotyping colorectal tumors.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Immunohistochemical expression pattern of MMR protein can specifically identify patients with colorectal cancer microsatellite instability.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Microsatellite Instability Testing in Colorectal Carcinoma: Choice of Markers Affects Sensitivity of Detection of Mismatch Repair–Deficient TumorsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Microsatellite instability in colorectal carcinoma. The comparison of immunohistochemistry and molecular biology suggests a role for hMSH6 [correction of hMLH6] immunostaining.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of standard mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability tests in a large cancer seriesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Detection of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer using an alternative multiplex assay of quasi-monomorphic mononucleotide markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Microsatellite Instability and Colorectal Cancer PrognosisSemantic proximity Read ↗

MSI-testing in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Mutations in hMSH6 alone are not sufficient to cause the microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer cell lines.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The prognostic role of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer patients.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.