Back to search

Article

How clinically relevant are prostate cancer cell lines? A comprehensive characterisation and multiomics comparison

2024-03-21

Abstract excerpt

Cell line experiments arguably remain the most used tool in preclinical cancer research, despite their limitations. With almost 95% drugs entering human trials failing, and up to 90% preclinical research failing before even being tested in humans, we must shift the pre-clinical paradigm. A range of in silico, in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo approaches are gaining popularity, with the aim of potentially replacing cel...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
cacc50dc-3aeb-5b51-be00-dde15ed40534
DOI
10.1101/2024.03.20.585982
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
How clinically relevant are prostate cancer cell lines? A comprehensive characterisation and multiomics comparisonDOI 10.1101/2024.03.20.585982
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.