Back to search

Article

Meta-analysis fine-mapping is often miscalibrated at single-variant resolution

2022-03-20

Abstract excerpt

Meta-analysis is pervasively used to combine multiple genome-wide association studies (GWAS) into a more powerful whole. To resolve causal variants, meta-analysis studies typically apply summary statistics-based fine-mapping methods as they are applied to single-cohort studies. However, it is unclear whether heterogeneous characteristics of each cohort ( e . g ., ancestry, sample size, phenotyping, genotyping, o...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
a8a7376c-f72b-5b26-96b2-45a72f2fe3aa
DOI
10.1101/2022.03.16.22272457
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Meta-analysis fine-mapping is often miscalibrated at single-variant resolutionDOI 10.1101/2022.03.16.22272457
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.