Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Identifying Cryptic Relationships.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) - 1 Jan 2017

Sun Lei, Dimitromanolakis Apostolos, Chen Wei-Min

Abstract excerpt

Cryptic relationships such as first-degree relatives often appear in studies that collect population samples, including genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) analyses. Cryptic relatedness not only increases type 1 error rate of association tests but also affects other analytical aspects of GWAS and NGS such as population stratification via principal component analysis. Here,...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Algorithms
Share to Genome, Human
Share to Genome-Wide Association Study

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

Share to Likelihood Functions

Share to Pedigree

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to Software

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 28980241
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7274-6_4

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-05.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Identifying Cryptic Relationships.PMID 28980241Read ↗

Identifying cryptic relationships.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Confounding from cryptic relatedness in haplotype-based association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Confounding from cryptic relatedness in case-control association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Case-control association testing in the presence of unknown relationships.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Pipeline for Classifying Relationships Using Dense SNP/SNV Data and Putative Pedigree Information.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Inference of unexpected genetic relatedness among individuals in HapMap Phase III.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Robust inference of population structure for ancestry prediction and correction of stratification in the presence of relatedness.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Limitations of principal components in quantitative genetic association models for human studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Profiling and Leveraging Relatedness in a Precision Medicine Cohort of 92,455 Exomes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Limitations of principal components in quantitative genetic association models for human studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Adjusting for principal components can induce spurious associations in genome-wide association studies in admixed populationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.