Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Regulator of Chromosome Condensation 2 Identifies High-Risk Patients within Both Major Phenotypes of Colorectal Cancer

24 Apr 2015

Abstract excerpt

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer has high incidence and mortality worldwide. Patients with microsatellite instable (MSI) tumors have significantly better prognosis than patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors. Considerable variation in disease outcome remains a challenge within each subgroup, and our purpose was to identify biomarkers that improve prediction of colorectal cancer prognosis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Share to Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Share to Genetic factors in colorectal cancer

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 25910952
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-3294

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 24 Oct 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Regulator of Chromosome Condensation 2 Identifies High-Risk Patients within Both Major Phenotypes of Colorectal CancerPMID 25910952Read ↗

Transcriptome and Network Dissection of Microsatellite Stable and Highly Instable Colorectal CancerSemantic proximity Read ↗

A robust genomic signature for the detection of colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite instability phenotype and high mutation frequency.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Mutation burden and other molecular markers of prognosis in colorectal cancer treated with curative intent: results from the QUASAR 2 clinical trial and an Australian community-based series.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Candidate driver genes in microsatellite‐unstable colorectal cancerSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comprehensive analysis of the expression profile and clinical implications of regulator of chromosome condensation 2 in pan-cancersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Coding microsatellite instability analysis in microsatellite unstable small intestinal adenocarcinomas identifies MARCKS as a common target of inactivation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Implications of mismatch repair-deficient status on management of early stage colorectal cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

DNA Copy-Number Alterations Underlie Gene Expression Differences between Microsatellite Stable and Unstable Colorectal CancersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Screening for microsatellite instability identifies frequent 3'-untranslated region mutation of the RB1-inducible coiled-coil 1 gene in colon tumors.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Identification of key genes and pathways involved in microsatellite instability in colorectal cancerSemantic proximity Read ↗

Survival in stage II/III colorectal cancer is independently predicted by chromosomal and microsatellite instability, but not by specific driver mutations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Chr20q Amplification Defines a Distinct Molecular Subtype of Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.