Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

To replicate or not to replicate: the case of pharmacogenetic studies: Establishing validity of pharmacogenomic findings: from replication to triangulation.

Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics - 1 Aug 2013

Aslibekyan Stella, Claas Steven A, Arnett Donna K

Abstract excerpt

No abstract is available from the source.

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Cardiovascular Diseases
Share to Genome-Wide Association Study
Share to Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Pharmacogenetics

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 23963160
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.112.000010
PMCID: PMC4961927

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

To replicate or not to replicate: the case of pharmacogenetic studies: Establishing validity of pharmacogenomic findings: from replication to triangulation.PMID 23963160Read ↗

To replicate or not to replicate: the case of pharmacogenetic studies: Have pharmacogenomics failed, or do they just need larger-scale evidence and more replication?Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Triangulation WIthin A STudy (TWIST) framework for causal inference within Pharmacogenetic researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Challenges in reproducibility of genetic association studies: lessons learned from the obesity field.Semantic proximity Read ↗

What Do We Mean by ‘Replication’ and ‘Validation’ in Genome-Wide Association Studies?Semantic proximity Read ↗

STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)--an extension of the STROBE statement.Semantic proximity Read ↗

STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA)--an extension of the STROBE statement.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE statement.Semantic proximity Read ↗

STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE statement.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pharmacogenomic studies: hype and reality.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Is replication the gold standard for validating genome-wide association findings?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effectiveness of strategies to increase the validity of findings from association studies: size vs. replication.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Systematic comparison of Mendelian randomization studies and randomized controlled trials using electronic databasesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.