Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A kinship-based modification of the armitage trend test to address hidden population structure and small differential genotyping errors.

PloS one - 8 Jun 2009

Rakovski Cyril S, Stram Daniel O

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We propose a modification of the well-known Armitage trend test to address the problems associated with hidden population structure and hidden relatedness in genome-wide case-control association studies. METHODS: The new test adopts beneficial traits from three existing testing s...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Case-Control Studies
Share to Computer Simulation
Share to Markov Chains

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Models, Statistical

Share to Models, Theoretical

Share to Principal Component Analysis

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Share to Research Design

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 19503792
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005825
PMCID: PMC2688076

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-19503792-2026-09-02.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-02.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A kinship-based modification of the armitage trend test to address hidden population structure and small differential genotyping errors.PMID 19503792Read ↗

A comparison of association methods correcting for population stratification in case-control studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic association models are robust to common population kinship estimation biases.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Strategy to control type I error increases power to identify genetic variation using the full biological trajectory.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Testing for genetic associations in arbitrarily structured populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Establishment of a standardized system to perform population structure analyses with limited sample size or with different sets of SNP genotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Limitations of principal components in quantitative genetic association models for human studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Optimizing the power of genome-wide association studies by using publicly available reference samples to expand the control group.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Incorporating family disease history and controlling case-control imbalance for population-based genetic association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Limitations of principal components in quantitative genetic association models for human studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Testing for genetic association in the presence of population stratification in genome-wide association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Incorporating family disease history and controlling case-control imbalance for population based genetic association studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Increasing the Efficiency of Genome-wide Association Mapping via Hidden Markov ModelsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.