Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Incorporating duplicate genotype data into linear trend tests of genetic association: methods and cost-effectiveness.

Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology - 1 Jan 2009

Borchers Bryce, Brown Marshall, McLellan Brian, Bekmetjev Airat, Tintle Nathan L

Abstract excerpt

The genome-wide association (GWA) study is an increasingly popular way to attempt to identify the causal variants in human disease. Duplicate genotyping (or re-genotyping) a portion of the samples in a GWA study is common, though it is typical for these data to be ignored in subsequent tests of genetic association. We demonstrate a method for including duplicate genotype data in linear trend tests of genetic...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Bipolar Disorder
Share to Case-Control Studies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Computer Simulation

Share to Cost-Benefit Analysis

Share to Genome-Wide Association Study

Share to Linear Models

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Software

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 19492982
DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1433
PMCID: PMC2861316

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Incorporating duplicate genotype data into linear trend tests of genetic association: methods and cost-effectiveness.PMID 19492982Read ↗

The cost effectiveness of duplicate genotyping for testing genetic association.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using duplicate genotyped data in genetic analyses: testing association and estimating error rates.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Identifying and mitigating batch effects in whole genome sequencing data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-variant and multi-variant trend tests for genetic association with next-generation sequencing that are robust to sequencing error.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessing the impact of differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A cost-effective statistical method to correct for differential genotype misclassification when performing case-control genetic association.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Quickly identifying identical and closely related subjects in large databases using genotype data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Recovering unused information in genome-wide association studies: the benefit of analyzing SNPs out of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using public control genotype data to increase power and decrease cost of case-control genetic association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies?Semantic proximity Read ↗

The effects of SNP genotyping errors on the power of the Cochran-Armitage linear trend test for case/control association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating the necessity of PCR duplicate removal from next-generation sequencing data and a comparison of approaches.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.