Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Prognostic significance of microsatellite instability and Ki-ras mutation type in stage II colorectal cancer.

Oncology - 1 Jan 2003

Wang Cathy, van Rijnsoever Marius, Grieu Fabienne, Bydder Sean, Elsaleh Hsny, Joseph David, Harvey Jennet, Iacopetta Barry

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVES: The survival of stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is approximately 70% at 5 years. Identification of the patient subgroup at high risk for tumour recurrence and death would allow more informed use of chemotherapy for this stage of disease. Several clinical and pathological factors have been reported to associate with worse survival. In the present study we investigated the prognostic...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Colorectal Neoplasms
Share to Genes, ras

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Multivariate Analysis

Share to Neoplasm Staging

Share to Patient Selection

Share to Predictive Value of Tests

Share to Proportional Hazards Models

Share to Survival Analysis

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 12697967
DOI: 10.1159/000069311

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-05.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Prognostic significance of microsatellite instability and Ki-ras mutation type in stage II colorectal cancer.PMID 12697967Read ↗

Microsatellite Instability and Colorectal Cancer PrognosisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Determination of <i>TP53</i> Mutation Is More Relevant Than Microsatellite Instability Status for the Prediction of Disease-Free Survival in Adjuvant-Treated Stage III Colon Cancer PatientsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Combined microsatellite instability and BRAF gene status as biomarkers for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colorectal cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Association Between Mutations in BRAF and Colorectal Cancer-Specific Survival Depends on Microsatellite Status and Tumor Stage.Semantic proximity Read ↗

KRAS mutation and microsatellite instability: two genetic markers of early tumor development that influence the prognosis of colorectal cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prognostic and predictive significance of MSI in stages II/III colon cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prognostic significance of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations in stage II/III colorectal cancer: A retrospective study and meta-analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Implications of mismatch repair-deficient status on management of early stage colorectal cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Combination of microsatellite instability and BRAF mutation status for subtyping colorectal cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Colorectal cancer molecular classification using BRAF, KRAS, microsatellite instability and CIMP status: Prognostic implications and response to chemotherapy.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Microsatellite instability in the management of stage II colorectal patients.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prognostic value of BRAF and KRAS mutation status in stage II and III microsatellite instable colon cancers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.