Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Genetic maps of microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers: are the distances accurate?

Genetic epidemiology - 1 May 2003

Leal Suzanne M

Abstract excerpt

Genetic maps play an important role in gene mapping. Inaccurate genetic maps can hinder gene mapping by biasing lod scores and reducing the power to map a trait to a particular region. Although sequence-based physical maps can provide a unique order for markers, they do not provide information on genetic map distances. By simulation studies, I investigated how many meioses are necessary to accurately estimate...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Child
Share to Chromosome Mapping
Share to Computer Simulation

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Confidence Intervals

Share to Meiosis

Share to Microsatellite Repeats

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 12687641
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.10227
PMCID: PMC6141025

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Genetic maps of microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers: are the distances accurate?PMID 12687641Read ↗

Guidelines for genotyping in genomewide linkage studies: single-nucleotide-polymorphism maps versus microsatellite maps.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of microsatellites, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and composite markers derived from SNPs in linkage analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison between microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers with respect to two measures of information content.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Detecting low-quality markers using map expanders.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparative informativeness for linkage of multiple SNPs and single microsatellites.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of genotyping error in model-free linkage analysis using microsatellite or single-nucleotide polymorphism marker maps.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic distance and markers used in linkage mapping.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Characterizing uncertainty in high-density maps from multiparental populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

How many SNPs are enough?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Influence of marker heterozygosity and genetic heterogeneity on fine mapping.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The reliability of haplotyping inference in nuclear families: misassignment rates for SNPs and microsatellites.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of SNPs and microsatellites as linkage mapping markers: lessons from the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata).Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.