Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Characteristics of genetic markers and maps for cost-effective genome screens using diallelic markers.

Genetic epidemiology - 1 Mar 2002

Goddard Katrina A B, Wijsman Ellen M

Abstract excerpt

New technologies for genotyping diallelic markers (SNPs) were recently developed that may be lower in cost, and more easily automated than microsatellite markers (STRPs). The reduction in genotyping costs resulting from such automation may significantly impact the overall cost of studies of complex traits, which generally require large sample sizes. Use of multiple SNPs in linkage analysis can recapture the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Alleles
Share to Chromosome Mapping
Share to Gene Frequency

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Linkage

Share to Genetic Markers

Share to Genetics, Medical

Share to Microsatellite Repeats

Share to Polymorphism, Genetic

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 11921081
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.0177

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Characteristics of genetic markers and maps for cost-effective genome screens using diallelic markers.PMID 11921081Read ↗

Genome screens using linkage disequilibrium tests: optimal marker characteristics and feasibility.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of microsatellites, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and composite markers derived from SNPs in linkage analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A unified sampling approach for multipoint analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits in sib pairs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Guidelines for genotyping in genomewide linkage studies: single-nucleotide-polymorphism maps versus microsatellite maps.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Multipoint linkage analysis with many multiallelic or dense diallelic markers: Markov chain-Monte Carlo provides practical approaches for genome scans on general pedigrees.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cost-effective designs for linkage disequilibrium mapping of complex traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparative informativeness for linkage of multiple SNPs and single microsatellites.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Characterizing uncertainty in high-density maps from multiparental populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cost-effective sib-pair designs in the mapping of quantitative-trait loci.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Microsatellites versus Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in confidence interval estimation of disease loci.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genome-wide linkage analysis with clustered SNP markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of SNPs and microsatellites as linkage mapping markers: lessons from the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata).Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.