Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of microsatellite instability and chromosomal instability in predicting survival of patients with T3N0 colorectal cancer.

Surgery - 1 Feb 2002

Gervaz Pascal, Cerottini Jean-Philippe, Bouzourene Hanifa, Hahnloser Dieter, Doan Christy L, Benhattar Jean, Chaubert Pascal, Secic Michelle, Gillet Michel, Carethers John M

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: At least 2 apparently independent mechanisms, microsatellite instability (MSI) and chromosomal instability, are implicated in colorectal tumorigenesis. Their respective roles in predicting clinical outcomes of patients with T3N0 colorectal cancer remain unknown. METHODS: Eighty-eight...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Aged
Share to Chromosome Aberrations
Share to Colorectal Neoplasms

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genes, ras

Share to Microsatellite Repeats

Share to Mutation

Share to Survival Rate

Share to Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 11854698
DOI: 10.1067/msy.2002.119816

Genes

BAX

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-11854698-2026-09-05.1. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-05.1.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of microsatellite instability and chromosomal instability in predicting survival of patients with T3N0 colorectal cancer.PMID 11854698Read ↗

Determination of <i>TP53</i> Mutation Is More Relevant Than Microsatellite Instability Status for the Prediction of Disease-Free Survival in Adjuvant-Treated Stage III Colon Cancer PatientsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic classification of colorectal cancer based on chromosomal loss and microsatellite instability predicts survival.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reduced Likelihood of Metastases in Patients with Microsatellite-Unstable Colorectal CancerSemantic proximity Read ↗

Survival in stage II/III colorectal cancer is independently predicted by chromosomal and microsatellite instability, but not by specific driver mutations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Microsatellite Instability and Colorectal Cancer PrognosisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Combined microsatellite instability and BRAF gene status as biomarkers for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colorectal cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Characterization of sporadic colon cancer by patterns of genomic instability.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Mutational Analysis of Patients With Colorectal Cancer in CALGB/SWOG 80405 Identifies New Roles of Microsatellite Instability and Tumor Mutational Burden for Patient OutcomeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Prognostic significance of microsatellite instability and Ki-ras mutation type in stage II colorectal cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prognostic significance and gene expression profiles of p53 mutations in microsatellite-stable stage III colorectal adenocarcinomas.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Inverse relationship between microsatellite instability and K-ras and p53 gene alterations in colon cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Combination of microsatellite instability and BRAF mutation status for subtyping colorectal cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.