Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Role of the LTR region between the enhancer and promoter in mink cell focus-forming murine leukemia virus pathogenesis.

Virology - 25 Apr 2001

Yoshimura F K, Wang T

Abstract excerpt

Long terminal repeat (LTR) sequences are important determinants of mink cell focus-forming (MCF) murine leukemia virus pathogenesis. These sequences include the enhancer and sequences between the enhancer and promoter (DEN). In a previous study we showed that a virus missing the DEN region in its LTR was severely attenuated in its ability to induce thymic lymphoma. In this study we observed that a virus with an...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Enhancer Elements, Genetic
Share to Leukemia, Experimental
Share to Lymphoma

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Retroviridae Infections

Share to Terminal Repeat Sequences

Share to Thymus Gland

Share to Thymus Neoplasms

Share to Tumor Virus Infections

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 11312668
DOI: 10.1006/viro.2001.0879

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Role of the LTR region between the enhancer and promoter in mink cell focus-forming murine leukemia virus pathogenesis.PMID 11312668Read ↗

Appearance of mink cell focus-inducing recombinants during in vivo infection by moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MuLV) or the Mo+PyF101 M-MuLV enhancer variant: implications for sites of generation and roles in leukemogenesis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

An enhancer variant of Moloney murine leukemia virus defective in leukemogenesis does not generate detectable mink cell focus-inducing virus in vivo.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Escape from in vivo restriction of Moloney mink cell focus-inducing viruses driven by the Mo+PyF101 long terminal repeat (LTR) by LTR alterations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Importance of a c-Myb binding site for lymphomagenesis by the retrovirus SL3-3.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Characterization of nuclear protein binding to a site in the long terminal repeat of a murine leukemia virus: comparison with the NFAT complex.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Mutation of the core or adjacent LVb elements of the Moloney murine leukemia virus enhancer alters disease specificity.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Infection by mink cell focus-forming viruses confers interleukin 2 (IL-2) independence to an IL-2-dependent rat T-cell lymphoma line.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Enhancer mutations of Akv murine leukemia virus inhibit the induction of mature B-cell lymphomas and shift disease specificity towards the more differentiated plasma cell stage.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Increased lymphomagenicity and restored disease specificity of AML1 site (core) mutant SL3-3 murine leukemia virus by a second-site enhancer variant evolved in vivo.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Virological events leading to spontaneous AKR thymomasSemantic proximity Read ↗

Differential behavior of the Mo + PyF101 enhancer variant of Moloney murine leukemia virus in rats and mice.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Mutations that abrogate transactivational activity of the feline leukemia virus long terminal repeat do not affect virus replication.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.