Back to search

Article

Knowledge, Attitudes and Demand Toward Cardiovascular Polygenic Risk Testing in Clinical Practice: Cross-Sectional Survey of Patients

2023-08-25

Abstract excerpt

<h4>ABSTRACT</h4> <h4>Background</h4> The goal of this study was to assess patients’ prior exposure and current level of knowledge of polygenic risk scores (PRSs). We also explored reactions to receiving a high-risk or low-risk score, and gauged the overall attitudes and demand patients have with regards to PRSs. <h4>Methods</h4> We developed an online investigator-designed survey based on existing validated tools...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
d46d6451-29f8-565f-a5ac-5de7d718f69c
DOI
10.1101/2023.08.24.23294594
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Knowledge, Attitudes and Demand Toward Cardiovascular Polygenic Risk Testing in Clinical Practice: Cross-Sectional Survey of PatientsDOI 10.1101/2023.08.24.23294594
Knowledge, attitudes and demand toward cardiovascular polygenic risk testing in clinical practice: cross-sectional survey of patients.Semantic proximity
Knowledge, views and expectations for cancer polygenic risk testing in clinical practice: A cross-sectional survey of health professionals.Semantic proximity
Development and Validation of the <i>Vanderbilt PRS-KS</i> , an Instrument to Quantify Polygenic Risk Score KnowledgeSemantic proximity
Polygenic risk scores in the clinic: a systematic review of stakeholders' perspectives, attitudes, and experiences.Semantic proximity
Why do people seek out polygenic risk scores for complex disorders, and how do they understand and react to results?Semantic proximity
Attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions of patients who received elective genomic testing as a clinical service.Semantic proximity
Non-genetic physicians’ self-assessment of knowledge and confidence toward genetic testing and counseling: a national survey in a high consanguineous populationSemantic proximity
Preparing healthcare providers to use polygenic risk scores: a qualitative study of learning needs and educational preferences.Semantic proximity
Development and evaluation of a novel educational program for providers on the use of polygenic risk scoresSemantic proximity
Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions.Semantic proximity
Knowledge and misconceptions of the French population regarding medical genetics: a survey of 3,000 respondentsSemantic proximity
Healthcare professionals' experiences returning monogenic, polygenic, and integrated risk results in the eMERGE study.Semantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.