Back to search

Article

Analysis of reporting completeness in exercise cancer trials: a systematic review

2019-11-14

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background Exercise is an effective therapeutic intervention for cancer survivors. Concerns about the completeness of reporting of exercise interventions have been raised in the literature, but without any formal analysis. This study aimed to evaluate the completeness of reporting of exercise interventions for cancer survivors in a representative sample of randomized clinical trials (RC...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
a05b5db0-e5ee-594e-850e-a1a1934619f7
DOI
10.21203/rs.2.12963/v3
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Analysis of reporting completeness in exercise cancer trials: a systematic reviewDOI 10.21203/rs.2.12963/v3
Methodological Rigor and Quality of Reporting of Clinical Trials Published with Physical Activity Interventions: A Report from the Strengthening the Evidence in Exercise Sciences Initiative (SEES Initiative)Semantic proximity
Guidance for reporting clinical trial registry records and published protocols use in systematic reviews of interventionsSemantic proximity
Methodological reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in three leading sports medicine journals over 10 yearsSemantic proximity
Use and appropriateness of Reporting Guidelines in physical therapy research: a protocol for a meta-research studySemantic proximity
PROTOCOL: LLM-Generated CONSORT Report for Increased Reporting: A Parallel-Arm Randomized Controlled TrialSemantic proximity
Methodological review to develop a list of bias items for adaptive clinical trials: Protocol and rationaleSemantic proximity
Randomized clinical trial quality has improved over time but is still not good enough: an analysis of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018Semantic proximity
Effects of exercise interventions on cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer patients: An overview of systematic reviewsSemantic proximity
Disagreement as a signal: an auditable dual-LLM and human-arbitrated workflow for methodological quality assessment in preclinical complex-intervention evidenceSemantic proximity
A scoping review on randomized controlled trials investigating effects of breathwork in women with breast cancerSemantic proximity
Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysisSemantic proximity
Patient reported outcomes and recruitment rates following the introduction of principled patient information leaflets (PrinciPILs): Protocol for a meta-analysisSemantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.