Article

Methodological review to develop a list of bias items for adaptive clinical trials: Protocol and rationale

2024-04-26

Abstract excerpt

<h4>ABSTRACT</h4> <h4>Background</h4> Randomized-clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold-standard for comparing health care interventions, but can be limited by early termination, feasibility issues, and prolonged time to trial reporting. In contrast, adaptive clinical trials (ACTs), which are defined by pre-planned modifications and analyses that occur after starting patient recruitment, are gaining popularity as the...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 701b73d7-fe2f-5d3e-b554-08b81fbb9b4c
DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.25.24306353

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Methodological review to develop a list of bias items for adaptive clinical trials: Protocol and rationaleDOI 10.1101/2024.04.25.24306353Read

PROTOCOL: LLM-Generated CONSORT Report for Increased Reporting: A Parallel-Arm Randomized Controlled TrialSemantic proximity Read

Stage-wise algorithmic bias, its reporting, and relation to classical systematic review biases in AI-based automated screening in health sciences: A structured literature reviewSemantic proximity Read

Guidance for reporting clinical trial registry records and published protocols use in systematic reviews of interventionsSemantic proximity Read

Trial-Adjusted Versus Generic Simulated Comparator Trial (SCT) Settings for Selection Bias Appraisal Using The I 2 -Test (Preprint)Semantic proximity Read

Randomized clinical trial quality has improved over time but is still not good enough: an analysis of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018Semantic proximity Read

Determining sample size for progression criteria for pragmatic pilot RCTs: The Hypothesis test Strikes Back!Semantic proximity Read

Design characteristics of Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) for human health: a scoping review of studies between 2009-2024Semantic proximity Read

Disagreement as a signal: an auditable dual-LLM and human-arbitrated workflow for methodological quality assessment in preclinical complex-intervention evidenceSemantic proximity Read

The Risk of Bias in Iranian Randomized Controlled Trials Included in Cochrane ReviewsSemantic proximity Read

The Comparability of Manual vs. Algorithm-Based Calculation of Clinical Trial Methodological Quality IndicesSemantic proximity Read

Trial Forge Guidance 5: ethical considerations in randomised Studies Within A Trial (SWATs)Semantic proximity Read

Statistical Considerations for the Design and Analysis of Pragmatic Trials in Aging ResearchSemantic proximity Read