Article

Use and appropriateness of Reporting Guidelines in physical therapy research: a protocol for a meta-research study

2020-05-26

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Introduction: </h4> Problems about reporting of a scientific study can affect dissemination of research in different manners. It is known that study methods are frequently not described in adequate detail and that results are presented ambiguously or selectively. To overcome these problems, reporting guidelines (e.g. CONSORT, PRISMA, STARD and STROBE statements) have been developed to increase the transparency...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: ee269111-789c-56ac-9e3e-a3c484a8c90e
DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.20.20106450

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Use and appropriateness of Reporting Guidelines in physical therapy research: a protocol for a meta-research studyDOI 10.1101/2020.05.20.20106450Read

Methodological reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in three leading sports medicine journals over 10 yearsSemantic proximity Read

The Evidence-Based Research approach for conducting new studies in physiotherapy research. A meta-research study comparing author guidelines of physiotherapy-related journals to those of leading journals with the highest impact factorSemantic proximity Read

Methodological Rigor and Quality of Reporting of Clinical Trials Published with Physical Activity Interventions: A Report from the Strengthening the Evidence in Exercise Sciences Initiative (SEES Initiative)Semantic proximity Read

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsSemantic proximity Read

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsSemantic proximity Read

Guidance for reporting clinical trial registry records and published protocols use in systematic reviews of interventionsSemantic proximity Read

Quality of reporting in abstracts in clinical trials of physical activity interventions: a cross-sectional analysis using the CONSORT for AbstractsSemantic proximity Read

Attitudes of physiotherapists towards the use of performance-based measures and questionnairesSemantic proximity Read

Cross-sectional analysis: interpretation of non-statistically significant results in randomised controlled clinical trials in rehabilitationSemantic proximity Read

Patient-reported quality indicators to evaluate physiotherapy care for hip and/or knee osteoarthritis- development and evaluation of the QUIPA tool.Semantic proximity Read

Development of a checklist to detect errors in meta-analyses in systematic reviews of interventions: study protocolSemantic proximity Read

Analysis of reporting completeness in exercise cancer trials: a systematic reviewSemantic proximity Read