Back to search

Article

Disagreement as a signal: an auditable dual-LLM and human-arbitrated workflow for methodological quality assessment in preclinical complex-intervention evidence

2026-07-01

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background: Artificial intelligence tools, especially large language models (LLMs), are increasingly entering evidence synthesis workflows. Methodological quality assessment, however, is not merely information extraction. When judgments involve non-specific factors of complex interventions, domain-specific controls, and context-dependent scoring rules, LLM outputs must be embedded withi...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
0e1b0472-5871-5101-a6a1-a045f157bbc8
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-10038039/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Disagreement as a signal: an auditable dual-LLM and human-arbitrated workflow for methodological quality assessment in preclinical complex-intervention evidenceDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10038039/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.