Article

Methodological reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in three leading sports medicine journals over 10 years

2020-06-22

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard scientific testing for medical interventions. However, low-quality RCTs may provide misleading evidence. This research elucidated the methodological reporting quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in three sports medicine journals over 10 years following the CONSORT statement. Methods and Findings In this st...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: dba205e4-6353-5022-89b6-a433c1c2679c
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-25578/v1

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Methodological reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in three leading sports medicine journals over 10 yearsDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-25578/v1Read

The Risk of Bias in Iranian Randomized Controlled Trials Included in Cochrane ReviewsSemantic proximity Read

Randomized clinical trial quality has improved over time but is still not good enough: an analysis of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018Semantic proximity Read

The Risk of Bias in Iranian Randomized Controlled Trials Included in Cochrane ReviewsSemantic proximity Read

Use and appropriateness of Reporting Guidelines in physical therapy research: a protocol for a meta-research studySemantic proximity Read

PROTOCOL: LLM-Generated CONSORT Report for Increased Reporting: A Parallel-Arm Randomized Controlled TrialSemantic proximity Read

Methodological Rigor and Quality of Reporting of Clinical Trials Published with Physical Activity Interventions: A Report from the Strengthening the Evidence in Exercise Sciences Initiative (SEES Initiative)Semantic proximity Read

Guidance for reporting clinical trial registry records and published protocols use in systematic reviews of interventionsSemantic proximity Read

Methodological review to develop a list of bias items for adaptive clinical trials: Protocol and rationaleSemantic proximity Read

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsSemantic proximity Read

The Evidence-Based Research approach for conducting new studies in physiotherapy research. A meta-research study comparing author guidelines of physiotherapy-related journals to those of leading journals with the highest impact factorSemantic proximity Read

Selection bias risk in “low bias” (RoB 2) rated randomised control trials (Preprint)Semantic proximity Read