Back to search

Article

Trial-Adjusted Versus Generic Simulated Comparator Trial (SCT) Settings for Selection Bias Appraisal Using The I 2 -Test (Preprint)

2024-09-17

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Aim: </h4> To test two null hypotheses: that I 2 testing with trial-adjusted SCT settings does not change the odds of identifying selection bias in clinical trials compared to I 2-testing with generic SCT settings, and that I 2 testing with trial-adjusted SCT settings does not change the odds of identifying selection bias in smaller trials (with sample size (n) = 100-199 per treatment group) compared to larger...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
1b134915-f2b5-59c9-b2cb-152180901abb
DOI
10.22541/au.172660483.33308453/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Trial-Adjusted Versus Generic Simulated Comparator Trial (SCT) Settings for Selection Bias Appraisal Using The I 2 -Test (Preprint)DOI 10.22541/au.172660483.33308453/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.