Article

The Comparability of Manual vs. Algorithm-Based Calculation of Clinical Trial Methodological Quality Indices

2025-04-15

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p><bold>Background</bold> Evidence hierarchies guide evidence-based practice by ranking forms of evidence to support translation and clinical decision-making. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) represent the highest form of evidence but are time and resource-intensive, contributing to the estimated 17-year lag in the translation of evidence into practice. Tools that automate asp...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 5fed3e23-fcbd-59a7-8aa2-4b77093765fa
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5486560/v1

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The Comparability of Manual vs. Algorithm-Based Calculation of Clinical Trial Methodological Quality IndicesDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5486560/v1Read

Stage-wise algorithmic bias, its reporting, and relation to classical systematic review biases in AI-based automated screening in health sciences: A structured literature reviewSemantic proximity Read

Randomized clinical trial quality has improved over time but is still not good enough: an analysis of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018Semantic proximity Read

Development of a checklist to detect errors in meta-analyses in systematic reviews of interventions: study protocolSemantic proximity Read

PICO and Risk Of bias Navigator for Evidence Based MedicineSemantic proximity Read

[How can we find, design, evaluate and use clinical practice guidelines?].Semantic proximity Read

Disagreement as a signal: an auditable dual-LLM and human-arbitrated workflow for methodological quality assessment in preclinical complex-intervention evidenceSemantic proximity Read

Cochrane Evaluation of (Semi-) Automated Review Methods (CESAR): Protocol for an adaptive platform study within reviewsSemantic proximity Read

Automation of Systematic Reviews with Large Language ModelsSemantic proximity Read

Guidance for reporting clinical trial registry records and published protocols use in systematic reviews of interventionsSemantic proximity Read

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsSemantic proximity Read

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsSemantic proximity Read

Methodological review to develop a list of bias items for adaptive clinical trials: Protocol and rationaleSemantic proximity Read