Back to search

Article

GPT-4 versus human authors in clinically complex MCQ creation: a blinded analysis of item quality

2024-08-21

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>MCQs are a popular assessment format in medical education. Creating clinically complex MCQs can be a time-consuming task for subject matter experts. Large language models such as GPT-4, a type of generative artificial intelligence (AI), are a potential tool for MCQ design. Clinically complex human-generated MCQs, at both novice and expert level, were compared with AI MCQs. A generic pro...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
4db24a04-26e6-5d8f-8eaa-8b147638604d
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-4831476/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
GPT-4 versus human authors in clinically complex MCQ creation: a blinded analysis of item qualityDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4831476/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.