Difference in chromatin packaging between active and inactive X chromosomes by fractionation and allele-specific detection.

doi:10.1006/bbrc.1998.8201

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Back to search

Article

Difference in chromatin packaging between active and inactive X chromosomes by fractionation and allele-specific detection.

Biochemical and biophysical research communications - 6 Mar 1998

Endo Y, Watanabe T, Kuwabara K, Tsunashima K, Mishima Y, Arakawa M, Takagi N, Kominami R

Abstract excerpt

Using a novel method consisting of chromatin fractionation and allele-specific detection, chromatin packaging is compared between active X (Xa) and inactive X (Xi) chromosomes for five tumor cell clones that were derived from inter-subspecific F1 female mice. Separation of heterochromatic (H) and...

Topics

Alleles
Animals
Chemical Fractionation
Chromatin
Crosses, Genetic
Dosage Compensation, Genetic
Euchromatin
Female
Fibrosarcoma
Genetic Markers
Heterochromatin
Male

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Mice

Mice, Inbred C57BL

Mice, Inbred Strains

Phosphoglycerate Kinase

Polymorphism, Genetic

RNA, Long Noncoding

Source

Open in PubMed

Identifiers

PMID: 9514870
DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8201

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 30 Aug 2026. Prepared record publication-9514870-2026-08-30.1. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-08-30.1.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 30 Aug 2026.

Community interpretation

Discuss the evidence

Ask a question, add context or challenge an interpretation. Community activity is separate from scientific evidence strength.

discussions

replies

Citations encouraged

Claims remain attributable.

No discussion yet

Be the first to add a careful, cited interpretation.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 8 closest

Difference in chromatin packaging between active and inactive X chromosomes by fractionation and allele-specific detection.PMID 9514870Read ↗

Differential chromatin packaging of genomic imprinted regions between expressed and non-expressed alleles.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Nucleosomes are translationally positioned on the active allele and rotationally positioned on the inactive allele of the HPRT promoter.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Dynamic organization of the beta-heterochromatin in the Drosophila melanogaster polytene X chromosome.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Spatial and structural segregation of the transcribed and nontranscribed alleles of c-myc in Namalva-S cells.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Abnormal X chromosome inactivation and tumor development.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comprehensively characterizing evolutionarily conserved differential dosage compensations of the X chromosome during development and in diseasesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Misbehaviour of XIST RNA in breast cancer cells.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Histone variants and epigenetic inheritance.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.