Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Alternative pork carcass evaluation techniques: II. Statistical analysis of error attributable to sex, genotype, and weight.

Journal of animal science - 1 Mar 1995

Boland M A, Foster K A, Schinckel A P, Chen W, Wagner J, Berg E P, Forrest J C

Abstract excerpt

Carcasses of 154 hogs representing seven genotypes with substantial variation in carcass composition and percentage of lean were completely dissected and analyzed. Measurements from a ruler, Hennessy probe, and electromagnetic scanner were each used to predict wholesale and lean boneless carcass value. Error, defined as dissected value minus predicted value, due to the omission of sex, genotype, weight, and their...

Topics

Analysis of Variance
Animals
Body Weight
Electromagnetic Phenomena
Female
Food Technology
Genotype
Male
Meat
Models, Statistical
Regression Analysis

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Sex Characteristics

Swine

United States

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 7607996
DOI: 10.2527/1995.733645x

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 29 Aug 2026. Prepared record publication-7607996-2026-08-29.1. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-08-29.1.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 29 Aug 2026.

Community interpretation

Discuss the evidence

Ask a question, add context or challenge an interpretation. Community activity is separate from scientific evidence strength.

0

discussions

0

replies

Citations encouraged

Claims remain attributable.

No discussion yet

Be the first to add a careful, cited interpretation.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 10 closest

Alternative pork carcass evaluation techniques: II. Statistical analysis of error attributable to sex, genotype, and weight.PMID 7607996Read ↗

Biases associated with genotype and sex in prediction of fat-free lean mass and carcass value in hogs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Alternative pork carcass evaluation techniques: I. Differences in predictions of value.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype and treatment biases in estimation of carcass lean of swine.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Application of a computer model to predict optimum slaughter end points for different biological types of feeder cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The influence of genotype, sex, and dietary lysine on pork subprimal cut yields and carcass quality of pigs fed to either 104 or 127 kilograms.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Utilization of beef from different cattle phenotypes to produce a guaranteed tender beef product.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using live estimates and ultrasound measurements to predict beef carcass cutability.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Beef carcass composition of slaughter cattle differing in frame size, muscle score, and external fatness.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Relationship between phenotype, carcass characteristics and the incidence of dark cutting in heifers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Selection for carcass and feedlot traits considering alternative slaughter end points and optimized management.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.