Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Alternative pork carcass evaluation techniques: I. Differences in predictions of value.

Journal of animal science - 1 Mar 1995

Boland M A, Foster K A, Schinckel A P, Wagner J, Chen W, Berg E P, Forrest J C

Abstract excerpt

Dissected and predicted wholesale and lean boneless values for 154 pork carcasses representing seven genotypes with substantial variation in carcass composition and percentage of lean were determined. Dissected carcass value was determined using a component pricing model, and four alternative models were specified to predict that value. The models included measurements from a ruler (RULER) and two carcass...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Body Composition
Share to Crosses, Genetic
Share to Genotype

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Models, Statistical

Share to Predictive Value of Tests

Share to Sex Characteristics

Share to United States

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 7607995
DOI: 10.2527/1995.733637x

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 11 closest

Alternative pork carcass evaluation techniques: I. Differences in predictions of value.PMID 7607995Read ↗

Alternative pork carcass evaluation techniques: II. Statistical analysis of error attributable to sex, genotype, and weight.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Biologically based coefficients for partitioning lamb and wool production costs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Application of a computer model to predict optimum slaughter end points for different biological types of feeder cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Consumer assessment of beef tenderloin steaks from various USDA quality grades at 3 degrees of doneness.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Biases associated with genotype and sex in prediction of fat-free lean mass and carcass value in hogs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Utilization of beef from different cattle phenotypes to produce a guaranteed tender beef product.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Economics of callipyge lamb production.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prediction of intramuscular fat content using CT scanning of packaged lamb cuts and relationships with meat eating quality.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Price Dispersion in the Barcelona Fish Auction: A Probabilistic Interpretation of the Failure of the Law of One PriceSemantic proximity Read ↗

Carcase grading reflects the variation in beef yield - a multivariate method for exploring the relationship between beef yield and carcase traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of objective measures of beef steak juiciness and their relationships to sensory panel juiciness ratings.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.