Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Multi-trait genomic prediction in pigs using single and multistep methods based on the absorption of ungenotyped animals.

Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie - 1 Sept 2023

Luan Tu, Nordbø Øyvind, Andersen-Ranberg Ina, Meuwissen Theo H E

Abstract excerpt

Many quantitative traits measured in breeding programs are genetically correlated. The genetic correlations between the traits indicate that the measurement of one trait carries information on others. To benefit from this information, multi-trait genomic prediction (MTGP) is preferable to use. However, MTGP is more difficult to implement compared to single-trait genomic prediction (STGP), and even more...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genomics
Share to Genotype

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Phenotype

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 37014360
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12772

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Multi-trait genomic prediction in pigs using single and multistep methods based on the absorption of ungenotyped animals.PMID 37014360Read ↗

Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving genetic evaluation of litter size and piglet mortality for both genotyped and nongenotyped individuals using a single-step method.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-Step Genomic Evaluation for Meat Quality Traits, Sensory Characteristics, and Fatty-Acid Composition in Duroc Pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent ssGBLUP evaluation of preselected animals for scarcely recorded feed intake in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from best linear unbiased prediction and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction of pig growth traits based on machine learning.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Predictive ability of multi-population genomic prediction methods of phenotypes for reproduction traits in Chinese and Austrian pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The effect of high-density genotypic data and different methods on joint genomic prediction: A case study in large white pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-step genomic evaluation with metafounders for feed conversion ratio and average daily gain in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction of growth in pigs based on a model including additive and dominance effects.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Experiences with a single-step genome evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.