Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Improving genetic evaluation of litter size and piglet mortality for both genotyped and nongenotyped individuals using a single-step method.

Journal of animal science - 1 Feb 2015

Guo X, Christensen O F, Ostersen T, Wang Y, Lund M S, Su G

Abstract excerpt

A single-step method allows genetic evaluation using information of phenotypes, pedigree, and markers from genotyped and nongenotyped individuals simultaneously. This paper compared genomic predictions obtained from a single-step BLUP (SSBLUP) method, a genomic BLUP (GBLUP) method, a selection index blending (SELIND) method, and a traditional pedigree-based method (BLUP) for total number of piglets born (TNB),...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Genomics
Share to Linear Models

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Litter Size

Share to Pregnancy

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Share to Sus scrofa

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 25549983
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8331

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Improving genetic evaluation of litter size and piglet mortality for both genotyped and nongenotyped individuals using a single-step method.PMID 25549983Read ↗

Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The prediction accuracies of linear-type traits in Czech Holstein cattle when using ssGBLUP or wssGBLUP.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Application of single-step genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in pig.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-step genomic evaluation with metafounders for feed conversion ratio and average daily gain in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Multi-trait genomic prediction in pigs using single and multistep methods based on the absorption of ungenotyped animals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Technical note: Genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in a single-step approach with metafounders.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Experiences with a single-step genome evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Investigating pig survival in different production phases using genomic models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Marker effect p-values for single-step SNP-BLUP genomic modelsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Single-Step Genomic Evaluations from Theory to Practice: Using SNP Chips and Sequence Data in BLUPF90.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.