Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Genomic prediction of growth in pigs based on a model including additive and dominance effects.

Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie - 1 Jun 2016

Lopes M S, Bastiaansen J W M, Janss L, Knol E F, Bovenhuis H

Abstract excerpt

Independent of whether prediction is based on pedigree or genomic information, the focus of animal breeders has been on additive genetic effects or 'breeding values'. However, when predicting phenotypes rather than breeding values of an animal, models that account for both additive and dominance effects might be more accurate. Our aim with this study was to compare the accuracy of predicting phenotypes using a...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Genes, Dominant

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Pedigree

Share to Phenotype

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to Sus scrofa

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 26676611
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12195

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Genomic prediction of growth in pigs based on a model including additive and dominance effects.PMID 26676611Read ↗

Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction using models with dominance and imprinting effects for backfat thickness and average daily gain in Danish Duroc pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impacts of additive, dominance, and inbreeding depression effects on genomic evaluation by combining two SNP chips in Canadian Yorkshire pigs bred in China.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Including dominance effects in the prediction model through locus-specific weights on heterozygous genotypes can greatly improve genomic predictive abilities.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genic and non-genic SNP contributions to additive and dominance genetic effects in purebred and crossbred pig traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimating additive and dominance variances for complex traits in pigs combining genomic and pedigree information.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies for additive and dominance effects for body composition traits using 50 K and imputed high-density SNP genotypes in Yunong-black pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Multi-trait genomic prediction in pigs using single and multistep methods based on the absorption of ungenotyped animals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving genetic evaluation of litter size and piglet mortality for both genotyped and nongenotyped individuals using a single-step method.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.